Jun 25, 2021
One of the major challenges for IT experts is patching. In this article, we will review the 5 biggest patch management mistakes and ways to avoid them to keep your environment safe.
Every software product has bugs and security vulnerabilities. Many people around the globe using security services are trying hard to find and exploit these loopholes. The majority of security events are vulnerabilities that have been addressed.
For instance, with WannaCry, Microsoft released a new update that addressed the vulnerabilities a few months before the global attack. By turning off patching, you leave your environment vulnerable to ransomware and exploits.
Consequently, there is no excuse for not having a durable patch management program. When vulnerability disclosures occur, you need to be ready to respond.
One major technique for patching involves giving all users local administrator rights to assist them in taking care of patching. What are the issues with this method? Will all users install those patches?
We have seen Windows Update reporting many patches that are waiting for installation. Giving users administrators rights means you're creating a major future attack. Generally, end users are not cautious when they are clicking links or opening email attachments which may now affect their personal computer and exploit their administrator rights.
Once the PC is infected, the local network can be used to spread the infection. Even in a secure environment, if an application is having issues while running its operations, allowing administrator rights will solve the issues while also creating a new security gap.
Therefore, it’s worth the time to work out the major permissions needed by an application rather than allowing blanket administrator rights.
Many operating systems and third-party applications have self-updating technology. This might seem like a great idea. However, if devices are correctly locked down, the user may not have permission to install the updates. By allowing the vendor to push out updates, there is a chance you will end up breaking critical business applications.
One of the examples is Java updates. Patches do not go through the same pattern of software testing which a full software release may pass through. Therefore, patches may often have their own major bugs. For instance, companies like Microsoft recalling patches due to major issues.
Microsoft offers enterprises Windows Server Updates Services (WSUS), which is a popular tool to manage software updates. Nevertheless, many companies make the mistake of thinking they are safeguarded because they use this program. Windows Server Updates Services does not offer comprehensive reports. Therefore, as an administrator, there is no way to know if you’re fully protected.
WSUS also depends on distributing Microsoft’s patches. But what about third-party software applications or non-Microsoft operating systems? It’s essential to regularly reassess your methods.
With a locked-down security environment or running Windows Server Updates Services, you may still be at risk. What about Mac and Linux devices? What about third-party applications, such as Adobe Flash and Java? What about social engineering attacks that cause users to give up usernames and passwords?
Patch management best practices are essential. It’s essential to choose a solution that overcomes the major challenges in developing a patch management process.
Do you want to overcome patching drawbacks? If you need strategies to create a strong patch management with a major focus on risk management, choose Vicarius. Vicarius is a vulnerability management software that targets cybersecurity officers as well as IT managers and operators from the U.S. market.
The Difference Between Remediation and MitigationKent Weigle October 15, 2021
Vulnerability Remediation GuidelinesKent Weigle October 14, 2021
What is Vulnerability Remediation?Kent Weigle October 08, 2021
Average Time to Remediation Hits 205 DaysKent Weigle August 12, 2021
Vulnerability Management: What You Need To KnowKent Weigle July 12, 2021